考研They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending.

在面临严峻、紧急的情况时，他们仍然可以使《第四修正案》的保护失效，并且他们可以采取合理的措施确保手机数据在搜查令悬而未决期间不会被删除或更改。

2015年考研阅读原文

考研Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.

奥林·克尔（Orin Kerr）是一位法学教授，他将21世纪数字信息的爆炸式增长和可访问性与20世纪将汽车作为一种虚拟生活必需品进行了比较：当时，法官们必须为乘用车这一新的个人领域制定新的规则；他们必须弄清楚第四修正案现在如何适用于数字信息。

2015年考研阅读原文

考研They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while waiting for a warrant.

当面临严峻、紧急的情况时，他们仍然可以使《第四修正案》的保护失效，并且他们可以采取合理的措施确保在等待搜查令时手机数据不会被删除或更改。

2015年考研真题（英语一）阅读理解 Section Ⅱ

考研The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they sift through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant.

法院裁定，警方在没有搜查令的情况下，对被捕者的钱包或钱包进行搜查，并不违反第四修正案。

2015年考研阅读原文

考研The court has ruled that police don't violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant.

法院裁定，警察在没有搜查令的情况下搜查被捕者的钱包或钱包，并不违反第四修正案。

2015年考研真题（英语一）阅读理解 Section Ⅱ

考研“Some of us have known for many, many years that the freedoms under the First Amendment are not totally unlimited, ” says Luce.

Luce说：“我们中的一些人多年来就知道，第一修正案规定的自由并不是完全无限的。”。

1997年全国攻读硕士学位研究生入学考试英语试题